Exhibit 99.1

STRATASYS LTD.

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED

MARCH 31, 2014

(UNAUDITED)

1

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2014
(UNAUDITED)

2

STRATASYS LTD.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

3

STRATASYS LTD.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

4

STRATASYS LTD.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

5

STRATASYS LTD.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

Note 1. Basis of Presentation and Consolidation

Stratasys Ltd. and subsidiaries (collectively the “Company”) is a leading global provider of additive manufacturing (“AM”) solutions for the creation of parts used in the processes of designing and manufacturing products and for the direct manufacture of end parts. The Company’s systems include desktop 3D printers for idea and design development, various systems for rapid prototyping (“RP”) and large production systems for direct digital manufacturing (“DDM”). The Company also develops, manufactures and sells materials for use with its systems and provides various services to its customers.

The Company is the result of the 2012 merger of two AM companies, Stratasys, Inc. and Objet Ltd. (“Objet”). On December 1, 2012 (the “merger date”), the two companies completed an all-stock merger (the “Stratasys-Objet merger” or “the merger”), pursuant to which Stratasys, Inc. became an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of Objet, and Objet changed its name to Stratasys Ltd.

The condensed consolidated interim financial statements include the accounts of Stratasys Ltd. and its subsidiaries. All intercompany accounts and transactions, including profits from intercompany sales not yet realized outside the Company, have been eliminated in consolidation.

The consolidated interim financial information herein is unaudited; however, such information reflects all adjustments (consisting of normal, recurring adjustments), which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair statement of results for the interim period. The results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2014 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. Certain financial information and footnote disclosures normally included in the annual consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted. The reader is referred to the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2013, filed as part of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for such year.

Recently adopted and issued accounting pronouncements:

In July 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), issued an accounting standard update, under which an entity must present an unrecognized tax benefit, or a portion of an unrecognized tax benefit, in the financial statements as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward, in the absence of certain conditions. This accounting standard update was effective for the Company in the three months ended March 31, 2014. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

6

STRATASYS LTD.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

Note 2. Acquisitions

MakerBot transaction

On August 15, 2013 (“MakerBot transaction date”) the Company acquired privately held Cooperation Technology Corporation (“MakerBot”) for an aggregate purchase price of $493.7 million (“MakerBot transaction”), which was calculated based on the Company’s share price of $97.46 as of the MakerBot transaction date.

The acquisition consideration was attributed to net assets on the basis of the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on an appraisal performed by management, which included a number of factors, including the assistance of independent appraisers. The estimated fair values are based on the information that was available as of March 31, 2014 and may be subject to changes.

MakerBot stockholders also could qualify for two earn-out payments. The first is for the six-month period ended December 31, 2013, which amounted to $10.8 million and which was paid in cash during April 2014. The second earn-out period is for the year ended December 31, 2014, for which MakerBot stockholders could qualify for aggregate payment of up to 0.8 million shares depending on the level of achievement of financial metrics for the period. The second earn-out payment, if earned, will be made in the Company’s shares or cash, or a combination thereof, at the Company’s discretion.

The fair value of the earn-out obligations was determined to be approximately $28.3 million at the MakerBot transaction date. The estimated fair value of the obligations is based on management’s assessment of whether, and at what level, the financial metrics will be achieved, and the present value factors associated with the timing of the payments. Management re-measures the fair value of the earn-out obligations at the end of each reporting period, with any changes in fair value being recorded in that period’s statement of operations. The fair value was estimated based on a Monte Carlo simulation, under which many scenarios are computed to measure possible outcomes of the financial metrics and the likelihood of occurrence. The resultant probability-weighted financial metrics are then applied to the earn-out formula to determine the cash flows under the earn-out. Those cash flows were then discounted using rates of the yields for U.S. treasury bonds with similar terms to maturity. This fair value measurement is based on significant inputs not observable in the market and thus represents a Level 3 measurement within the fair value hierarchy. Based on the results for the six months ended December 31, 2013, the Company determined that the payment for the first earn-out period was $10.8 million, and estimates the earn-out obligation for the second earn-out period to be $10.7 million, as of March 31, 2014.

Certain MakerBot employees participate in a performance bonus plan in connection with the MakerBot transaction. Participating employees are entitled, contingent on certain continuing employment conditions, to bonus payments of compensation that in the aggregate will equal, dollar-for-dollar, the actual amounts determined in the earn-out calculation.

Other transactions

In October 2013, the Company acquired all non-controlling interests of its investment in Stratasys Japan Co. Ltd., for a total purchase price of approximately $2 million which was paid during the first quarter of 2014. Prior to the acquisition, the Company owned 51% of the Japanese company. The excess of the purchase price over the carrying value of the non-controlling interests was credited to additional paid-in capital. This acquisition enabled the Company to expand its Japanese operations.

In January 2014, the Company purchased certain assets, including customer service contracts and inventory, from its local channel partner in South Korea, Sysopt Engineering Co. Ltd. The acquisition enables the Company to expand its South Korean operations.

7

STRATASYS LTD.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

Subsequent transactions

     In April 2014, the Company announced the signing of a definitive agreement to acquire Solid Concepts Inc. (“Solid Concepts”), an independent additive manufacturing service bureau. Under the terms of the definitive agreement with Solid Concepts, the Company will acquire 100% of Solid Concepts’ outstanding shares for total consideration of up to $217 million, including a payment on closing of $157 million (or, if settled in cash, part on closing and part six months after closing) and deferred payments of $60 million. Certain of Solid Concepts’ employees may also qualify for retention-related and other payments of up to $78 million. Subject to certain requirements for cash payments, the Company retains the discretion to settle any of the amounts payable under the definitive agreement and the retention plan in its shares, cash or any combination of the two.

     In April 2014, the Company announced the signing of a definitive agreement to acquire Harvest Technologies Inc (“Harvest”), a specialty additive manufacturing service bureau. Under the terms of the definitive agreement with Harvest, the Company will acquire 100% of Harvest’s outstanding shares for cash, shares, or a combination of the two, at the discretion of the Company. Certain of Harvest’s employees may also qualify for certain retention-related payments.

     These two transactions are expected to enable the Company to expand its existing digital manufacturing service business, to create a leading strategic platform to meet a broad range of customers' additive manufacturing needs and provide opportunities to leverage manufacturing services capabilities.

     In April 2014, the Company acquired certain assets of Interfacial Solutions LLC (“Interfacial Solutions”), a privately held provider of thermoplastics research and development and production services. This transaction is designed to strengthen the Company’s materials research and development skills and enable it to become vertically integrated in material development and manufacturing and also increase materials production space and capacity.

8

STRATASYS LTD.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

Note 3. Inventories

Inventories consisted of the following (in thousands):

Note 4. Intangible Assets

The intangible assets consisted of the following (in thousands):

In process research and development with a gross carrying value of $14.4 million at December 31, 2013 was launched during the three months ended March 31, 2014 and is now classified as developed technology with a six-year life for amortization.

Amortization expense for intangible assets for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 was approximately $19.0 million and $13.1 million, respectively.

As of March 31, 2014, estimated amortization expense relating to intangible assets currently subject to amortization for each of the next five years and thereafter was as follows (in thousands)

9

STRATASYS LTD.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

Note 5. Earnings (Loss) Per Share

The Company complies with ASC 260, Earnings Per Share, which requires dual presentation of basic and diluted income (loss) per ordinary share attributable to Stratasys Ltd. for all periods presented. Basic net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares, outstanding for the reporting periods. Diluted net income per share is computed using the weighted-average number of common shares and the potential dilutive common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted shares outstanding include the dilutive effect of in-the-money options and restricted stock units (“RSUs”) using the treasury stock method, as well as, shares held back from issuance in connection with the MakerBot acquisition.

The following table presents a reconciliation of the numerator and denominator of the basic and diluted income (loss) per share computations for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013:

The computation of diluted net income (loss) per share excluded stock options to purchase 0.16 million and 3.05 million thousands shares for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, because their inclusion would have had an anti-dilutive effect on the diluted net income (loss) per share.

10

STRATASYS LTD.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

Note 6. Income Taxes

The Company’s effective tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 was 915.8% and 4.6%, respectively, on the loss before income taxes in those periods. The Company’s effective tax rate has varied significantly since the December 1, 2012 Stratasys-Objet merger due to the lower tax rate in Israel, and changes in the mix of income (loss) between the U.S. and Israel, as well as the impact of the tax benefit as a result of the realization of the deferred tax liability associated with the amortization of the intangible assets. The income of $7.5 million attributable to the change in fair value of the Company’s earn-out obligations in the three months ended March 31, 2014 is non-taxable, and therefore had a significant impact on the effective tax rate.

Note 7. Fair Value Measurements

Fair value is defined as the exit price, or the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants as of the measurement date. A hierarchy has been established for inputs used in measuring fair value that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that the most observable inputs be used when available.

Observable inputs are inputs market participants would use in valuing the asset or liability developed based on market data obtained from sources independent of the Company. Unobservable inputs are inputs that reflect the Company’s assumptions about the factors market participants would use in valuing the asset or liability developed based upon the best information available under the circumstances. The hierarchy is broken down into three levels. Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, and inputs (other than quoted prices) that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability. Categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

11

STRATASYS LTD.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

The following table presents the Company’s assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis, segregated by classes (in thousands):

Foreign exchange forward contracts are presented as other current assets and other current liabilities and are valued primarily based on observable inputs, including interest rate curves and both forward and spot prices for currencies (Level 2 inputs). At March 31, 2014, the Company had foreign exchange forward contracts in effect for the conversion of $90.0 million into €66.3 million and $40.3 million into NIS 140.8 million out of which the Company designated $13.8 million as cash flow hedge for accounting purposes. The Company uses short-term cash flow hedge contracts to reduce its exposure to variability in expected future cash flows resulting mainly from payroll costs denominated in New Israeli Shekels. The change in fair value of those contracts of $0.1 million is included in accumulated other comprehensive income at March 31, 2014. These contracts mature through September 30, 2014.

Foreign exchange forward contracts in effect as of December 31, 2013 were for the conversion of $54.0 million into €40.3 million and $18.3 million into NIS 65.0 million.

The earn-out obligations are described in note 2 and are classified within level 3 because fair value is measured based on the probability-weighted present value of the consideration expected to be transferred. A decrease in the earn-out obligations fair value of $7.5 million and an increase of $0.8 million were recorded in the three months ended March 31, 2014 and in the twelve months ended December 31, 2013 respectively.

Long term investment consists of an investment in debt securities classified as available-for-sale and are recorded at fair value. The fair value is based on the sale of similar securities in the market, as well as last sales of these securities in the market (Level 2 inputs). The debt securities were sold during the three months ended March 31, 2014.

Other financial instruments consist mainly of cash and cash equivalents, short-term bank deposits, current and non-current receivables, accounts payable and accruals. The fair value of these financial instruments approximates their carrying values.

12

STRATASYS LTD.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

Note 8. Stock-Based Compensation Plan

Stock-based compensation expense for stock options and restricted stock units (“RSUs”) was allocated as follows (in thousands):

A summary of stock option activity for the three months ended March 31, 2014 is as follows:

The outstanding options generally have a term of ten years from the grant date. Options granted become exercisable over the vesting period, which is normally a four-year period beginning on the grant date, subject to the employee’s continuing service to the Company.

The fair value of stock options is determined using the Black-Scholes model. The weighted-average grant date fair value of options that were granted during the three months ended March 31, 2014 was $42.85.

During the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company issued 116,609 and 292,808 shares, respectively, upon the exercise of stock options. This resulted in an increase in equity of $1 million and $3.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

As of March 31, 2014, the unrecognized compensation cost related to all unvested stock options of $37.1 million is expected to be recognized as expense over a weighted-average period of 1.8 years.

During the three months ended March 31, 2014, the Company granted 6,247 RSUs. The fair value of RSUs is determined based on the quoted price of the Company’s common stock on the date of the grant.

As of March 31, 2014, the unrecognized compensation cost related to all unvested RSUs of $18.2 million is expected to be recognized as expense on a straight-line basis over a weighted-average period of 3.4 years.

13

STRATASYS LTD.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

Note 9. Contingencies

Claims and Proceedings

In December 2008, an employee, whose employment with the Company was subsequently terminated, filed a claim against the Company demanding that, based on an alleged undertaking the Company had made, the Company issue to him an option that would allow him to maintain an equity interest of 1.45% in the Company, as well as reimburse salary reductions he had suffered in an aggregate sum of NIS 552,000 ($159,000). In July 2009, the Company filed its statement of defense, rejecting the claims raised by the former employee. Together with the former employee, the Company initiated mediation of the dispute, but did not reach a settlement. The former employee later amended his initial pleading to seek an additional NIS 441,000 ($127,000) on account of alleged wrongful termination by the Company. The claim was dismissed in November 2013 by the Israeli labor court, also awarding the Company legal expenses of NIS 55,000. The plaintiff has appealed the decisions and the appeal is currently ongoing at the national Israeli labor court.

On March 4, 2013, four current or former minority shareholders (two of whom were former directors) of the Company filed two lawsuits against the Company in an Israeli district court. The lawsuits demand that the Company amend its capitalization table such that certain share issuances prior to the Stratasys-Objet merger to certain of Objet’s shareholders named as defendants would be cancelled, with a consequent issuance of additional shares to the plaintiffs to account for the subsequent dilution to which they have been subject. The lawsuits also name as defendants Elchanan Jaglom, Chairman of the Executive Committee of the Company’s board of directors, David Reis, Chief Executive Officer, various shareholders of the Company who were also shareholders of Objet, and, in one of the lawsuits, Ilan Levin, a director. The lawsuits allege in particular that a series of investments in Objet during 2002 and - 2007 was effected at a price per share that was below fair market value, thereby illegally diluting those shareholders that did not participate in the investments. The plaintiffs also allege that a portion of the amount invested in those transactions was actually invested by an investor who was already a shareholder of Objet and allegedly acting in concert with Mr. Jaglom, and that the interest of these two shareholders in these transactions was not properly disclosed to the minority shareholders at the time. The lawsuits furthermore claim that the Company effectively engaged in backdating the issuance of certain shares, in that shares that Objet reported as having been issued in 2006 and 2007 were actually issued at a subsequent date—as late as 2009. The Company filed its statements of defense in May 2013 denying the plaintiffs’ claims. Also, the Company filed motion to dismiss the claims on grounds of statute of limitations, laches and lack of cause. On April 1, 2014, the court held a hearing on the motion and a decision will be issued after the parties will submit summation briefs. The Company also filed an appeal to make the plaintiffs pay full court fees, which was held on May 8, 2014.

The Company believes that these claims are all entirely baseless and that the transactions in question were conducted in accordance with applicable law. Management does not believe that these lawsuits will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s operations or financial condition, and the Company intends to vigorously defend these lawsuits.

The Company is a party to various other legal proceedings, the outcome of which, in the opinion of management, will not have a material adverse effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.

14